Quite often you will hear people asking the difference between blending and Juicing or which one is better regarding nutrient provision to the body. Well, the truth is that both are beneficial in different ways.
If you believe the buzz, ketosis—whether via the almost-zero-carb ketogenic diet or via ketone supplements—can curb appetite, enhance performance, and cure nearly any health problem that ails you. Sound too good to be true? It probably is.
Maybe with a side of guacamole and some shredded cheese on top?
“I’m doing this for my health,” you could purr virtuously, as you topped your delectably marbled, medium-rare steak with a fried egg.
Well, many advocates of the ketogenic diet argue exactly that: By eating a lot of fat and close to zero carbohydrates you too can enjoy enhanced health, quality of life, performance, brain function, and abs you can grate that cheese on.
So, in this article, we’ll explore:
If you’re just curious about ketogenic diets:
If you want to change your body and/or health:
If you’re an athlete interested in performance:
If you’re a fitness pro, or interested in geeking out with nutritional science:
If you’ve called Client Care at Precision Nutrition, you might have spoken to Lindsay.
Aside from being an incredibly helpful and friendly voice on the other end of the phone, Lindsay is also a tireless advocate for a health condition that has shaped her life in many ways: epilepsy.
Epilepsy is an ancient brain phenomenon, known to medicine thousands of years ago. To manage it, our Neolithic ancestors drilled holes in one another’s skulls, perhaps trying to let the bad stuff out—a practice known as trepanation.
Around 400 BCE, the ancient Greek doctor Hippocrates observed a man who had seizures for five days. On the sixth day, he noted, as the patient “abstained from everything, both gruel and drink, there were no further seizures.”
About 1,400 years later, in 1000 CE, the famous Persian physician Avicenna—who coined the term “epilepsy”, from the ancient Greek verb epilambanein (to seize or attack, as the neurological condition caused seizures), speculated that “overfeeding” might be a risk factor for epilepsy.
By 1911, a pair of Parisian doctors were trying fasting as a treatment for children with epilepsy, and in the United States, physical culturist Bernarr McFadden was claiming that fasting for three days to three weeks could cure anything.
Despite not having the tools and insight of modern neuroscience, these and other people who explored fasting and dietary prescriptions for neurological disorders were on to something.
We now know that there may be a dietary connection—not just between epilepsy and what we eat (or don’t), but also with many other brain disorders.
Unfortunately, fasting isn’t fun. We evolved with a pretty strong aversion to starvation, and our brains and GI tracts have lots of ways to make sure we eat enough.
Which raises the question:
Could we get the health benefits of fasting another way?
In other words:
In 1921, two things happened.
One: Endocrinology researcher Rollin Woodyatt noted that the same chemical environment happened with both starvation and a diet that was very low in carbohydrates and very high in fat.
Two: Dr. Russell Wilder wondered:
Could a person get the health benefits of fasting without actually fasting?
He and other doctors at the Mayo Clinic experimented with what Wilder called the “ketogenic diet” during the early 1920s. Not only did children with epilepsy seem to improve overall with this type of diet, they seemed to think and behave better as well.
Proven by several notable medical authorities, a ketogenic diet as a treatment for childhood epilepsy found its way into medical textbooks by around 1940, and stayed there throughout the 20th century.
Nowadays, aging, contact sports, and modern warfare present us with new populations of people whose brains might benefit from a ketogenic diet:
There was another group of people who became curious about ketogenic diets some time in the 1980s and 1990s: bodybuilders and physique athletes.
These folks weren’t too concerned about brain health or longevity. They wanted to be ripped.
The ketogenic diet seemed like a magic bullet: a way to eat butter, bacon and cream, and still get abs.
Physique- and performance-conscious people, as well as people looking to maximize lifespan and life quality, have rediscovered this old-school dietary paradigm and are wondering:
It depends. (Don’t you hate that? But it’s true.)
To understand why, we’ll look at:
Let’s start by clarifying just what a ketogenic diet is.
It might be hard to translate “low carb, high fat” into everyday foods.
To give you a better idea of the ketogenic diet in real life, here’s a comparison:
|PN Mixed Meal||~30%||~40%||~30%|
And here’s what that might look like translated into meals.
Notice a few things.
For the first three meals, protein is more or less the same, with a little variation.
Ketogenic diets, on the other hand, include less protein—usually closer to 10 or 20 percent of total daily intake.
The Precision Nutrition plate suggests high-fiber, slow-digesting carbohydrates, such as whole grains, beans and legumes, fruits, and starchy vegetables.
The Paleo plate may contain slightly fewer carbohydrates (early human diets often had plenty of them), but eliminates the grains and beans / legumes.
The “low carb” plate will have fewer carbohydrates than the first two, but still have a small amount, likely from vegetables.
The ketogenic meal shoots for near-zero carbs. Most estimates suggest around 10-15 grams of carbs a day. To give you an idea of what this looks like, that’s about one fist-sized portion of cooked carrots, or about 10-15 grapes. For the whole day.
The Precision Nutrition plate suggests about 1-2 thumb-sized portions of fat-dense foods (like nuts, cheese, avocado, olive oil, etc.) per meal, depending on body size, activity level, and goals.
The Paleo and low-carb plates may be roughly similar, with a little variation.
We might call all three of these “moderate fat”. Indeed, some indigenous diets (aka variations on the “Paleo” concept) are often quite low in fat, especially saturated fat.
The ketogenic meal, on the other hand, is high fat—even up to 90 percent of total energy intake. That means if you’re eating a 500-calorie spinach and mushroom salad, you get about 2 thumb-sized pieces of chicken breast on top, and then pour about 3-4 glugs of olive oil on top… Yum yum!
A ketogenic diet is the most restrictive and limited of all four of these styles of eating. Here’s what you can eat on a ketogenic diet:
A small amount of protein, such as:
A large amount of high-fat foods, such as:
A very small amount of very-low-carbohydrate vegetables, such as:
Here’s what you can’t eat on a ketogenic diet:
So, let’s recap:
So why go to all this effort?
Well, for particular groups of people, ketosis may indeed be helpful.
(For other people, of course, it may not be helpful… and it may be actively harmful. We’ll talk more about that in a moment.)
To understand why this is true, let’s look at how ketosis actually works.
Ketones are a group of organic compounds with a specific structure.
The term “ketone” was actually coined around 1850 by German chemist Leopold Gmelin, along with the term “ester”. (See? Not as new as you’d think!)
We can use two types of ketones as energy sources, acetoacetate and D-β-hydroxybutyrate. (The β sign means “beta”.)
Our body can make ketones through a complex biochemical pathway.
Put very simply, when the conditions are right (for instance, during starvation or fasting, or when our carb intake is very low):
The shape and orientation of molecules is important.
Stereoisomers are molecules with the same chemical makeup, but different shapes and configurations. You can imagine your right hand as a “stereoisomer” of your left: they both share the same components, just arranged differently.
Shape and orientation matter to molecules and their actions, just like having right-handed and left-handed gloves or shoes matters.
The ketone D-β-hydroxybutyrate is not the same as its stereoisomer L-β-hydroxybutyrate.
This difference in molecular configuration matters for several parts of the conversion process.
For instance, when D-β-hydroxybutyrate is converted back to acetyl-CoA, its intermediate form D-β-hydroxybutyrate-CoA isn’t the same thing as L-β-hydroxybutyrate-CoA (an intermediate of β- oxidation).
Each stereoisomer uses different enzymes for conversion, much like each lock has its own unique key.
This difference also matters for ketone supplementation (see below).
You want to supplement the right stereoisomer, rather than a random pile of ketone types. Usually in test tube chemistry, you get a mix of stereoisomers (often around half one type, and half another type), unlike our body, which only uses and makes one version.
Ketosis happens when blood ketones are higher than normal either through dietary changes (which lead to very low blood glucose) or through supplementation (independent of blood glucose concentrations).
Some people like to think of ketone bodies as the fourth energy source for humans (in addition to carbohydrates, fats and proteins).
That’s technically true, but the alcohol in booze (aka ethanol) can also be used for energy. Just because we can metabolize something doesn’t always mean we should.
Ketosis, which just means having more ketone bodies than normal, should not be confused with ketoacidosis, which is a potentially dangerous metabolic situation of uncontrolled ketosis.
Normally, our body is very good at self-regulating.
If it senses acid levels rising (as happens in ketosis), it responds by buffering with more alkaline molecules (such as bicarbonate), changing blood levels of CO2, absorbing hydrogen ions, or telling the kidneys to excrete more dihydrogen phosphate and ammonium ions.
However, if for some reason our body can’t compensate, and blood pH drops below about 7.35 (in other words, becoming more acidic), we’re in trouble.
This usually happens in diabetics and alcoholics, since their normal metabolic mechanisms may not work properly.
For the average healthy person, dietary ketosis or even brief fasting is generally safe.
We can make our own ketone bodies naturally, through the process of ketogenesis.
Our ancestors kicked off ketogenesis the good old fashioned way: by starving. About 72 hours into starvation, ketogenesis is happening and you’re in ketosis. Congratulations!
Ketosis is essentially an effect of fasting. This means that many of the health effects of fasting may be due to ketosis itself, rather than something like energy restriction.
Interestingly, how quickly ketosis happens varies by age and species.
Other mammals don’t seem to go into ketosis nearly as quickly as humans (your friendly neighborhood hibernating bear or squirrel who doesn’t eat for weeks to months at a time? No ketosis.)
Babies, on the other hand, go into ketosis within a few hours of not eating.
This may have to do with our energy-hungry human brains. About 20 percent of our overall energy intake is devoted to feeding our brains. Although bears and squirrels are clever enough to get into the garbage, they don’t have brains as large as we do.
It seems that ketogenesis is a human backup system that provides enough energy (via ketone bodies) to the ol’ noggin in times of starvation.
And it may be this particular evolutionary adaptation—which perhaps began as a way to keep the thinking factory upstairs working when food was scarce—that also enables the brain-benefiting effects of the ketogenic diet.
Stored glucose (our sugar-based fuel) is actually rather heavy. We don’t carry around much of it. Our body prefers to store most of our excess energy as body fat.
When we eat normally, our brain gets enough energy from glucose that can easily pass the blood-brain barrier.
When we stop eating, we run out of stored glucose (as glycogen) within 2-3 days (faster if we’re active), and have to find some other fuel source.
By the way, the relative heaviness of stored glycogen is why many people report fast weight loss on a ketogenic or low-carb diet: their body has dumped a little extra weight in the form of glycogen and water (which tags along with glycogen in a 3 parts water to 1 part glycogen ratio). Unfortunately, this water and glycogen comes right back once we start eating normally again.
Most people frown on starving children with epilepsy, so a ketogenic diet is the next best thing.
By cutting off the body’s carbohydrate (aka glucose) supply, but providing energy and nutrients in the form of fat (plus a little protein), we can get the same effects as straight-up starvation: ketosis.
As with starvation, it usually takes some time to get into ketosis once we stop eating carbs.
Many people like to measure their ketosis with Ketostix, which test for ketones in the urine. This is not always a reliable indicator, since all it tells you is whether you’re excreting excess ketones, not whether you’re actually in ketosis per se.
In addition, Ketostix only measure the presence of excreted acetoacetate, not the presence of D-β-hydroxybutyrate.
Over time, our body’s excretion of ketones can change, even if we’re still in ketosis. Therefore, you may see different readings on the Ketostix, regardless of what is actually happening in your body.
If ketones are what we want, why not just take them instead of making our own by fasting or cutting out carbohydrates?
Great idea, and totally new… except it isn’t.
As early as 1953, there were studies looking into whether we could “artificially” produce ketosis by supplementation.
Today, we know that by supplementing with ketone bodies (usually D-β-hydroxybutyrate or certain esters) you can raise the level of ketone bodies in the blood without being in ketogenesis.
This has a lot of cool possibilities. If ketone supplementation can give us the health benefits of ketosis without us having to fast / starve or follow a very restrictive diet, that could be a win-win.
Unfortunately, we still don’t have conclusive human studies on this that would give us clear direction. Check back in 10 years.
The buzz is that ketone supplements can make you thin and cure whatever ails you. But what you read about in the media or on the interwebs isn’t always what scientists actually found in the lab.
If you didn’t know better, you’d think ketone supplementation just started. Actually, research on this topic goes back to the 1950s. All of it has been conducted using rats. Here are the findings.
D-β-hydroxybutyrate supplementation made some types of rats eat less and lose weight, but not other types of rats.
Some evidence kinda sorta indicates that D-β-hydroxybutyrate supplementation might activate brown fat (a metabolically active fat that is, in part, responsible for thermogenic adaptations) via the sympathetic nervous system, but there was no follow-up.
Blood glucose regulation
Another showed that ketone supplementation with either 1, 3-butanediol acetoacetate diester or sodium/potassium β-hydroxybutyrate decreased blood glucose with no changes in cholesterol or blood triglycerides (the not-so-great side effects of the ketogenic diet).
Traumatic brain injury
In one study, infusing D-β-hydroxybutryate into adult rats after traumatic brain injuries showed improved energy (ATP) levels.
In another study, D-β-hydroxybutryate didn’t improve things and actually caused damage to the blood-brain barrier, even in healthy rats.
New evidence suggests that it may not be D-β-hydroxybutryate or acetoacetate preventing seizures; rather, it might be the relatively short-chain fatty acids (nanoeic and decanoic acids) in the diets when on a ketogenic diet crossing the blood-brain barrier, inhibiting seizures.
But in another study that exposed rats to high-pressure oxygen containing ketone esters such as R,S-1,3-butanediol acetoacetate diester, the rodents saw increased blood β-hydroxybutryate and decreased seizures.
A recent study found that ketone supplementation extended survival in mice with metastatic cancer. But while it’s true that most cancers have a highly anaerobic metabolism, this in not universal. If proven to be effective, it’s likely that ketone supplementation would be an additional treatment rather than a stand alone treatment for cancer, because of its robust nature.
For now, almost no studies on ketone supplementation have used human clinical trials. So if anyone tells you that ketone supplementation is a miracle cure, ask if you can get some for your pet rat… if it’s the right kind of rat.
Ketogenesis and ketosis are easy to study.
All you have to do is starve people, or feed them a high-fat/low-carb diet, and wait. Then you see if it changes whatever you’re interested in fixing.
Since we’ve known about fasting and ketosis for quite a long time, and it’s relatively easy to research, there are probably good reasons why it’s not yet considered a miracle cure.
And it’s not because Big Pharma or Carbohydrate Corporation or The Cancer Conspiracy have vested interests. (Trust me, we scientists can barely keep the grad students from contaminating the super-purified water by leaving the lid off the jug, never mind organize an evil cabal of ketosis deniers.)
To be fair, the introduction of anti-epileptic drugs in the late 1930s onward did lead to less interest in dietary ketosis as a treatment for epileptic children.
But we don’t yet use ketosis (or ketone supplementation) to fix everything from muffin tops to hangnails because:
That being said, here are some interesting and promising new avenues for ketosis… as well as some “don’t bother” examples.
We know that fasting is often an effective short-term treatment for metabolic dysfunction such as poor glucose control / early Type 2 diabetes, chronic inflammation, or hypertension.
We don’t know for sure yet whether this is because of ketosis or some other mechanism (such as programmed cell death, aka apoptosis).
However, research suggests that in some cases, such as type 2 diabetes, ketosis may be useful as a short-term treatment or a “boost” that helps return metabolic processes back to a more normal and well-regulated state.
In these specific situations, a ketogenic diet or a structured intermittent fasting program done under close medical supervision for a specific objective, may be a useful as part of a multi-pronged treatment program that probably should include other therapeutic tools such as medication or other well-established health procedures.
Notice all our italics here. What we mean is:
Verdict: Could help in some cases, but should be done with a clear purpose and carefully monitored. Not a long-term “cure-all” for most people.
Why does ketosis seem to help some types of metabolic dysfunction?
Ketones may help, in part, because they decrease oxidative stress, boost antioxidants and scavenge free radicals.
Oxidation is a natural part of cellular metabolism, but too much oxidation, too fast, without the balance of antioxidants, contributes to many metabolic and other diseases.
Many metabolic disorders are related to this process of oxidation, in which our cells essentially “rust” from the inside. If we can slow and regulate oxidation, it may improve our health and longevity.
We know ketosis for epilepsy is a win—can ketosis help other types of brain illnesses and injuries?
Recent research suggests that many brain disorders (such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, among other neurodegenerative diseases) are related to other metabolic disorders such as diabetes, obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
These metabolic and neourodegenerative diseases show common features, such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation. In fact, Alzheimer’s is now often described as “diabetes of the brain”, or “Type 3 diabetes”.
The presence of ketones also seems to improve outcomes from traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, right now, most of these studies have been done on rats.
Still, based on what we’ve seen with epilepsy and rat studies, chances are good that ketones may be a low-risk treatment—and perhaps even a preventive strategy—to improve brain health. See above about getting medical supervision from someone other than Dr. Google.
Verdict: Probably can’t hurt, might help people with neurodegeneration and/or mild to moderate brain injury.
We know that caloric restriction (CR) improves longevity in most organisms studied. We know that intermittent fasting seems to have some of the same benefits, sometimes.
But right now, we don’t know if ketosis works the same way.
The real question here is: Who’s willing to find out?
Would you stick to a ketogenic diet in the name of advancing knowledge, achieving scientific glory as a “ketonaut”? Most of us wouldn’t.
Plus, without a control group (say, your identical twin who lives exactly the same lifestyle as you, in the exact same environment, with only your diets being different), it’s hard to know for sure whether your 100th birthday was due to ketosis or something else.
For now, any longevity benefits would be mostly speculative. And your 100th birthday cake would have to be a block of butter.
Verdict: You could try this one and get your next of kin to report back… but most people wouldn’t want to.
Athletes need fuel to perform.
Could we possibly enable people to tap into their stored body fat more effectively, and require less re-fueling from stuff like sugary energy gels?
Ketosis lets you avoid glycogen depletion (aka bonking, hitting the wall), because you aren’t using glycogen as your energy source, so you don’t need to take in carbs as you compete. Instead you’re using fat and ketone bodies. You increase fat oxidation, spare glycogen, produce less lactate and use less oxygen at submaximal rates.
All this sounds great, but the exercise physiologists’ consensus is that while all these adaptations are true, the problem is that with fat and ketone bodies as fuel, you’re not going to go as fast as you can when using with glucose and carbohydrates.
The bottom line for athletes is performance, and so far there is only one very new study showing a small improvement in cyclist’s performance with ketone supplementation combined with carbohydrate supplementation (compared to just carbohydrate supplementation alone).
It seems that combining ketones with carbs, rather than exclusively using one or the other, might offer some benefit.
A recent study compared the effect of drinking just carbs to drinking carbs + ketones in male and female elite cyclists.
After not eating overnight (about 16 hours) the cyclists came to the lab and drank either a carb drink or a carb + ketone (c + k) drink.
C + k drink
Total amount of substrate in both drinks were 573 mg/kg body weight.
The cyclists drank half of their drink, rode for 1 hour at 75% of their max power output. Then they drank the other half of their drink and biked as far as they could in 30 minutes.
After a week, the cyclist repeated the experiment with the opposite drink.
When drinking the c + k drink the cyclists biked, on average, 2 percent (400 meters) farther longer over the 30 minutes.
There were some metabolic differences to note in with the c+k drink:
Bottom line: Supplementing with a combination of carbohydrates and ketones may improve performance in aerobic competitions.
Verdict: Some intriguing possibilities, particularly for aerobic performance, but to date there very little evidence to improve overall athletic performance.
Oh, insulin, you naughty monkey! You have been getting yourself in so much trouble lately!
Low-carb advocates in the late 1990s and early 2000s thought maybe they had stumbled on the key to fighting flab: insulin. Insulin is mainly a storage hormone: Its job is basically to help nutrients get into cells.
The low-carb / insulin hypothesis, dramatically oversimplified, went like this:
Now, this theory did have some merits.
For one thing, it got some of us unhooked from processed sugary and starchy treats, and thinking more about fiber content and healthy fats.
Unfortunately, insulin is not the only player. There’s never only one player in the team sport and complex system that is your body.
Nor does insulin act alone. Energy storage is governed largely by our brain, not a single hormone.
The other upside to the low-carb approach was that people often ate more protein and more fat. When we eat protein and fat, we release satiety hormones, particularly CCK, which is one of the main hormones that tells us we’re full.
More protein and fat means we’re often less hungry. Which means we eat less. Which means we lose fat. It’s the “eating less” part (not the insulin part) that actually matters.
On top of this, if you’ll recall, carbohydrates are relatively heavy to store. Lower the carb intake, and our body will eventually release some water and glycogen.
Result: Weight loss. Magic!
Yet being in ketosis doesn’t seem to have any special advantage for losing body fat (rather than just weight), especially if we consider the lifestyle and behavior aspect to this.
You may find it easy to eat less when all you can eat is protein and fat. But after a while, you may grow tired of bringing your own whole salmon to parties, and wonder what the other 95% of the grocery store is up to. You may start to have fantasies about a threesome: you, Oreos, and chocolate sauce. Not only that, you may be getting some serious scurvy and other nutrient deficiencies.
For women in particular, lowering carbohydrate intake seems to have negative effects.
Women’s bodies go on high alert faster when they sense less energy and fewer nutrients coming in. Many women have found that the low-carb diet that worked great for their husband not only didn’t work for them, but it knocked out their menstrual cycle on the way out the door.
Verdict: We don’t recommend the ketogenic diet for sustainable fat loss.
As part of the carb-insulin hypothesis, people thought that maybe metabolism would also increase during ketosis.
A recent study looked at whether or not there was a significant increase in metabolic rate when going from a high-carbohydrate diet (48% carbohydrate) to a ketogenic diet (6% carbohydrate), with protein being the same (around 16-17%).
With this dietary change, insulin went down while fatty acids and ketone bodies went up. Basal metabolism (energy expenditure) went up by about 100 kcal per day.
Seems obviously good—but not so fast.
Figuring out what this actually means is complicated.
Researchers had to correct metabolism based on body weight, which as you’ve read, tends to drop when water is lost on low-carb diets.
The authors concluded that while there was a small increase in metabolism initially, that disappeared over the four weeks while insulin levels were still low.
So their study didn’t support the insulin-carb hypothesis.
Is protein actually the key factor?
The authors of the study think that differences found in other studies comparing high and low-carb diets are because of differences in protein intake rather than carbohydrate intake in those studies.
Protein promotes satiety and takes the most energy to digest and absorb, so differences in weight loss may be net calories absorbed, rather than decreases in insulin or increases in metabolism.
As you may have read above, insulin is mainly a storage hormone. It’s also considered an anabolic hormone. As in building things. As in getting swole.
For the most part, we need insulin—along with other hormones, such as growth hormone and testosterone—to create an anabolic, muscle-building environment. Trying to build muscle while in ketosis is like stepping on the gas and the brake at the same time.
However, as with athletic performance, we may discover that there is some benefit to supplementary ketones while building muscle. We don’t know yet.
Verdict: Build muscle with a more appropriately anabolic diet that includes carbohydrates (particularly around training), and supplement with ketones if you want to experiment.
By Krista Scott-Dixon, Ph.D. and Helen Kollias, Ph.D.
You Might Also Enjoy...
Quite often you will hear people asking the difference between blending and Juicing or which one is better regarding nutrient provision to the body. Well, the truth is that both are beneficial in different ways.
Abstain from high-fiber offering, fatty meats and dairy products.
Gatorade is sold as an exercise enhancement drink. It contains re-hydrating electrolytes but also has a high concentration of sugar.
Think of carbs as raw material that powers your body. You need them to make sugar for energy.
New research supports the idea that spending more time standing during waking hours can help to counteract some of the negative consequences of sedentary lifestyles.
Sitting has become so ingrained in our lives that it can be easy to lose sight of how much we do it.